VUPEN: Difference between revisions

From Buggedplanet.info
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
|Date||Source||Title||Tags
|Date||Source||Title||Tags
|-
|-
|07.06.2012||computerworld.com.au||[http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/427009/vupen_security_denies_it_been_hacked/ Vupen Security denies it's been hacked
|07.06.2012||computerworld.com.au||[http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/427009/vupen_security_denies_it_been_hacked/ Vupen Security denies it's been hacked: Reports of 130 zero-days being leaked 'totally false,' says CEO of French vulnerability research firm]||[[VUPEN]]
Reports of 130 zero-days being leaked 'totally false,' says CEO of French vulnerability research firm]||[[VUPEN]]
|-
|-
|06.06.2012||twitter.com||[http://twitter.com/securityerrata/status/210550374627676160 Security Errata @securityerrata - Dear @Vupen, we have received reports that your site was compromised and ~ 130 0-day stolen this year. Any comment? No reply to mails...]||[[VUPEN]]
|06.06.2012||twitter.com||[http://twitter.com/securityerrata/status/210550374627676160 Security Errata @securityerrata - Dear @Vupen, we have received reports that your site was compromised and ~ 130 0-day stolen this year. Any comment? No reply to mails...]||[[VUPEN]]

Revision as of 22:10, 7 June 2012